| 1 |
On 05/21/2012 09:50 PM, Thanasis wrote: |
| 2 |
> on 05/21/2012 09:52 PM Markos Chandras wrote the following: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
>> |
| 5 |
>> I believe the old library appears to be owned by the new version |
| 6 |
>> because it is "preserved". Once you run the revdep-rebuild |
| 7 |
>> command, everything should link to the new linker name and you |
| 8 |
>> should be safe to remove the old library. See the functions |
| 9 |
>> preserve_old_lib{_notify} in eutils eclass for more details and |
| 10 |
>> the "preserve-libs" option for the FEATURES variable in |
| 11 |
>> make.conf. |
| 12 |
>> |
| 13 |
>> |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> I don't see any "preserve-libs" option in the man page of |
| 16 |
> make.conf. Anyway, the bottom line is that equery may list an |
| 17 |
> installed package as owning a certain library file, when in reality |
| 18 |
> that file belonged to an older version of the package than the one |
| 19 |
> installed, in which case it may be or appear misleading. |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
Yes sorry this "preserve-libs" feature is part of portage-2.2. In any |
| 22 |
case, a revdep-rebuild will fix your problem. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
-- |
| 25 |
Regards, |
| 26 |
Markos Chandras / Gentoo Linux Developer / Key ID: B4AFF2C2 |
Archives