| 1 |
on 05/21/2012 09:52 PM Markos Chandras wrote the following: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> I believe the old library appears to be owned by the new version |
| 5 |
> because it is "preserved". Once you run the revdep-rebuild command, |
| 6 |
> everything should link to the new linker name and you should be safe |
| 7 |
> to remove the old library. See the functions preserve_old_lib{_notify} |
| 8 |
> in eutils eclass for more details and the "preserve-libs" option for |
| 9 |
> the FEATURES variable in make.conf. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
I don't see any "preserve-libs" option in the man page of make.conf. |
| 14 |
Anyway, the bottom line is that equery may list an installed package as |
| 15 |
owning a certain library file, when in reality that file belonged to an |
| 16 |
older version of the package than the one installed, in which case it |
| 17 |
may be or appear misleading. |
Archives