From: | Nikos Chantziaras <realnc@×××××.com> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | [gentoo-user] Re: How to avoid perl harbor (pun intended) | ||
Date: | Mon, 13 Jul 2015 13:31:39 | ||
Message-Id: | mo0ej6$aql$1@ger.gmane.org | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-user] How to avoid perl harbor (pun intended) by Simon Thelen |
1 | On 13/07/15 16:01, Simon Thelen wrote: |
2 | > On 15-07-13 at 05:19, walt wrote: |
3 | >> Today's update started as a disaster: perl wants to upgrade from |
4 | >> 5.20.2 to 5.22.0, but all of my existing perl modules insist on having |
5 | >> 5.20.2 so the perl update blocks and then emerge stopped with an error |
6 | >> [...] |
7 | > It worked for me after I added --backtrack=30 |
8 | |
9 | That was it. After using that option, it works. |
10 | |
11 | So I guess the default value is not good enough. |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: How to avoid perl harbor (pun intended) | Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk> |