Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Florian Philipp <lists@×××××××××××.net>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: raid1 grub ext4
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 13:16:28
Message-Id: 4DA6F34D.1030701@binarywings.net
In Reply to: [gentoo-user] Re: raid1 grub ext4 by James
1 Am 14.04.2011 14:56, schrieb James:
2 > Florian Philipp <lists <at> binarywings.net> writes:
3 >
4 >
5 >
6 >> Your boot partition is not by any chance a logical partition and
7 >> therefore would be (hd0,4) and not (hd0,0)?
8 >
9 > grub> root (hd0,4)
10 > Error 22: No such partition
11 >
12 > No?
13 >
14 >
15 >> You can try to use 0.90 metadata by specifying it while creating the
16 >> RAID with mdadm. I'm using it myself because AFAIK this is the only way
17 >> for grub to handle a single RAID containing partitions instead of
18 >> partitions containing RAIDs.
19 >
20 > OK so I read about this "0.90 metadata" but could not find
21 > details (syntax) of when and exactly how to use this information.
22 > OK, so, I've rebooted and got the md1, md2, md3 renamed by
23 > (whatever) to md125 md127 and md126, respectively.
24 >
25
26 The parameter for specifying metadata versions is -e. Try
27 mdadm --create --metadata=0.90 ...
28
29 Of course it can only be specified while creating the array.
30
31 The renaming is pretty ugly. You can force specific names by
32 circumventing the kernel autodetection. Add the following kernel parameters:
33 raid=noautodetect md=0,/dev/sda1,/dev/sdb1 ...
34
35 This assembles md0 with sda1 and sdb1. You can also try to keep
36 autodetection on and only force the numbering for your raid partition.
37
38 Hope this helps,
39 Florian Philipp

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature