1 |
Zac Slade <krakrjak <at> volumehost.net> writes: |
2 |
|
3 |
|
4 |
> Well what's the workload? Random reads, sequential reads, random writes, |
5 |
> sequential writes? All these are important to selecting the best method of |
6 |
> getting optimal I/O. There is no one perfect filesystem/raid level for |
7 |
> everything. |
8 |
|
9 |
Hello Zac, |
10 |
|
11 |
A lightly loaded web server should be able to use reiser3. I think the |
12 |
intial setup will be reiser 3 as all of my experiences with Reiser3 have |
13 |
been very positive. |
14 |
|
15 |
No LMV or EVMS |
16 |
|
17 |
> Since you are using only a 400Mhz processor I think that reiser3 may be out of |
18 |
> the question. It uses a lot of CPU and gets great performace, but if the |
19 |
> processor can't keep up then reiser loses a lot of performance. |
20 |
|
21 |
Since the web server will be lightly loaded (maybe 100 hits per day with |
22 |
simple html files, the 400 MHz cpu should be fine. It it starts to |
23 |
get more action than the machine can handle, I'll migrate it up |
24 |
to another machine with more resources.... |
25 |
|
26 |
> Also any Device Mapper layers will slow you down a bit. I user LVM and love |
27 |
> it, but if I really need maximum raw throughput I'd look to hw RAID or sw |
28 |
> based RAID (if my system is up to that). |
29 |
|
30 |
The Adaptech dual channel controller has a drive on each channel. |
31 |
It's an AHA-3940/UWUWD ATC-7882U . How do I find if this |
32 |
controller does hardware raid and if so, how to set it up under Gentoo? |
33 |
If not, software raid sounds interesting to learn about. If the |
34 |
machine installation turns out poorly, I'll just try it again. |
35 |
It's not controlling critical data, just a learning/fun type of |
36 |
project (I.E. it's a stressless adventure, OK?) |
37 |
|
38 |
|
39 |
> For filesystems it just depends on your needs. If you want high sequential |
40 |
> reads/writes then JFS and XFS are particularly good. If you need an all |
41 |
> around performer, random reads/writes with good sequential throughput then |
42 |
> ext3 and reiser (see above note on reiser). Reiser is also the best at |
43 |
> purely random access especially with large directories (1,000s of little |
44 |
> files). |
45 |
|
46 |
Mostly 'reads' I would suppect from several simple and small web-sties |
47 |
on a machine this is only a web server? |
48 |
|
49 |
> To be honest if you just go look at the filesystem howtos and filesystem |
50 |
> comparisons (use google luke) you won't go wrong. They are all up to the |
51 |
> task as long as you know a little bit about what your workload is going to |
52 |
> look like. |
53 |
|
54 |
Reiser3 is my choice. No LVM or EVMS for now. SO I need a howto |
55 |
on setting up raid (hardware if this aforementioned scsi card can |
56 |
to that with Gentoo) ortherwise software raid. |
57 |
|
58 |
Maybe (2) equal size swap partiontions on each drive? Identical partitions |
59 |
on these identical drives? |
60 |
|
61 |
|
62 |
Nothing stressful here, just a chance to set up a slightly diferent |
63 |
gentoo web server, for my home based projects. |
64 |
|
65 |
As the Aussie's say (No worries!) |
66 |
|
67 |
James |
68 |
|
69 |
|
70 |
-- |
71 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |