| 1 |
Thank you Volker, thank you Walt! |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
It seems that adding the xulrunner flag was the right way to go. |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
However |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
euse -i xulrunner |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
says |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
'Build native browser integration against xulrunner instead of firefox or |
| 12 |
seamonkey' |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
So.. do I really need xulrunner? I think seamonkey is enought for me... |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
To answer I tried |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
equery d xulrunner |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
[ Searching for packages depending on xulrunner... ] |
| 21 |
media-video/vlc-0.9.10 (nsplugin & !seamonkey? <net-libs/xulrunner-1.9.1) |
| 22 |
(nsplugin&!seamonkey? >=net-libs/xulrunner-1.8) |
| 23 |
www-client/mozilla-firefox-3.0.14 (xulrunner? =net-libs/xulrunner-1.9.0*) |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
but I'm not sure I've interpreted right the result... |
| 26 |
Do it means that vlc-0.9.10 depends on an xulrunner version between 1.8 and |
| 27 |
1.9.1 if I don't have seamonkey installed? |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
If that would be the case, I should simply emerge seamonkey, right? |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
(Sorry for the newbie questions: I'm doing my best to become as much |
| 32 |
independent as possible!!) |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
Thanks a lot, |
| 35 |
Massimiliano |
Archives