Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Paul Hartman <paul.hartman+gentoo@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Is Qemu dead?
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2011 14:37:33
Message-Id: CAEH5T2MgQVxZBHo72G9MCYya+7CBswKEw3Dnqj0_nHWF1Jqqog@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: [gentoo-user] Is Qemu dead? by Grant Edwards
1 On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 9:14 AM, Grant Edwards
2 <grant.b.edwards@×××××.com> wrote:
3 > I've been trying to use Qemu to do some test installs of Ubuntu
4 > server.  I've used Qemu successfully in the past, but it seems to have
5 > hit a dead end.  The "stable" version (0.11) of Qemu just plain
6 > doesn't work. There are constant segfaults and kernel panics in the
7 > guest environment.
8
9 Version 0.11 is more than two years old. I don't use stable Gentoo; is
10 a 2-year-old version of a frequently-updated package normal in stable,
11 or is the Qemu in Gentoo in need of some attention?
12
13 > I updated to the ~x86 version (0.14) -- while the guest OS installs
14 > and runs OK, kernel acceleration (kqemu module) is no longer
15 > supported, and without it Qemu is really slow.
16
17 I am not a Qemu user, but I seem to remember reading that the
18 preferred method for hardware virtualization/acceleration with Qemu
19 nowadays is KVM.
20
21 > For now I've switched to VirtualBox, but the console implementation in
22 > VirtualBox is nightmarishly slow. When I do -l looks like it's
23 > scrolling by at about 9600 baud.
24 >
25 > Is Qemu dead?  Or just dying?
26
27 The latest version (0.15) was released last month and the Qemu-dev
28 mailing list has a lot of activity (few dozen messages per day), so it
29 seems alive to me.

Replies

Subject Author
[gentoo-user] Re: Is Qemu dead? Grant Edwards <grant.b.edwards@×××××.com>