1 |
On Monday, 19. September 2011 19:43:50 Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: |
2 |
> Am Montag 19 September 2011, 19:25:28 schrieb Michael Schreckenbauer: |
3 |
> > On Monday, 19. September 2011 18:36:18 Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: |
4 |
> > > Am Montag 19 September 2011, 16:41:08 schrieb Michael Schreckenbauer: |
5 |
> > > > On Monday, 19. September 2011 16:22:31 Alan McKinnon wrote: |
6 |
> > > > > On Mon, 19 Sep 2011 10:30:41 +0200 |
7 |
> > > > > |
8 |
> > > > > Nicolas Sebrecht <nsebrecht@×××××.fr> wrote: |
9 |
> > > > > > The 17/09/11, pk wrote: |
10 |
> > > > > > > dbus is installed in my system, but only because I |
11 |
> > > > > > > run |
12 |
> > > > > > > Xfce4 |
13 |
> > > > > > > (I |
14 |
> > > > > > > am |
15 |
> > > > > > > thinking of installing something else due to it's |
16 |
> > > > > > > becoming |
17 |
> > > > > > > bloated |
18 |
> > > > > > > just like gnome). And I have "-dbus" in my global |
19 |
> > > > > > > make.conf. |
20 |
> > > > > > > |
21 |
> > > > > > > PS. I am quite astonished at the fact that I have a |
22 |
> > > > > > > computer |
23 |
> > > > > > > that is |
24 |
> > > > > > > _way_ faster than the first machine I installed |
25 |
> > > > > > > GNU/Linux |
26 |
> > > > > > > (an |
27 |
> > > > > > > Amiga |
28 |
> > > > > > > 4000 with a 68040 cpu at 40Mhz) on but the |
29 |
> > > > > > > "experience" |
30 |
> > > > > > > is |
31 |
> > > > > > > still |
32 |
> > > > > > > the same; it takes about the same time to boot, the |
33 |
> > > > > > > same |
34 |
> > > > > > > time |
35 |
> > > > > > > (or |
36 |
> > > > > > > even slower) to load a program. It seems the faster |
37 |
> > > > > > > the |
38 |
> > > > > > > computer |
39 |
> > > > > > > the more I have to wait for it to finish some task. |
40 |
> > > > > > > Contradictory, |
41 |
> > > > > > > no? Wonder why that is... (bloat?). |
42 |
> > > > > > |
43 |
> > > > > > Believe it or not but I bet you're not doing the same |
44 |
> > > > > > tasks |
45 |
> > > > > > with |
46 |
> > > > > > your |
47 |
> > > > > > modern machine and could just not run the user-end |
48 |
> > > > > > software |
49 |
> > > > > > you |
50 |
> > > > > > use |
51 |
> > > > > > today on a Amiga 4000 with a 68040 cpu at 40Mhz because |
52 |
> > > > > > they |
53 |
> > > > > > learn |
54 |
> > > > > > new |
55 |
> > > > > > feature since then. |
56 |
> > > > > : |
57 |
> > > > > :-) Example: |
58 |
> > > > > Try run a browser on that Amiga. I doubt it would even |
59 |
> > > > > manage to |
60 |
> > > > > display the Gentoo logo at http://www.gentoo.org. |
61 |
> > > > |
62 |
> > > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Origyn_Web_Browser |
63 |
> > > |
64 |
> > > and I am sure that it will display pngs and jpegs with full colours |
65 |
> > > just fine. I am sure displaying 2 or 4 MP pictures will be working |
66 |
> > > great. Just |
67 |
> > > like the mpeg4 you are trying to watch. Or the ogv. |
68 |
> > |
69 |
> > I don't think so :) |
70 |
> > But it is a web-browser, that runs on classic amiga os and I really |
71 |
> > think, that it can display http://www.gentoo.org just fine. |
72 |
> |
73 |
> so can lynx. Does it make it usefull with todays internet? There are more |
74 |
> pages than just gentoo.org - The Sun for example or CNN or other high |
75 |
> quality sites. |
76 |
|
77 |
Yes, I agree. You seem to miss the point of my post completely. |
78 |
|
79 |
Best, |
80 |
Michael |