1 |
Am Montag 19 September 2011, 19:25:28 schrieb Michael Schreckenbauer: |
2 |
> On Monday, 19. September 2011 18:36:18 Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: |
3 |
> > Am Montag 19 September 2011, 16:41:08 schrieb Michael Schreckenbauer: |
4 |
> > > On Monday, 19. September 2011 16:22:31 Alan McKinnon wrote: |
5 |
> > > > On Mon, 19 Sep 2011 10:30:41 +0200 |
6 |
> > > > |
7 |
> > > > Nicolas Sebrecht <nsebrecht@×××××.fr> wrote: |
8 |
> > > > > The 17/09/11, pk wrote: |
9 |
> > > > > > dbus is installed in my system, but only because I run |
10 |
> > > > > > Xfce4 |
11 |
> > > > > > (I |
12 |
> > > > > > am |
13 |
> > > > > > thinking of installing something else due to it's |
14 |
> > > > > > becoming |
15 |
> > > > > > bloated |
16 |
> > > > > > just like gnome). And I have "-dbus" in my global |
17 |
> > > > > > make.conf. |
18 |
> > > > > > |
19 |
> > > > > > PS. I am quite astonished at the fact that I have a |
20 |
> > > > > > computer |
21 |
> > > > > > that is |
22 |
> > > > > > _way_ faster than the first machine I installed |
23 |
> > > > > > GNU/Linux |
24 |
> > > > > > (an |
25 |
> > > > > > Amiga |
26 |
> > > > > > 4000 with a 68040 cpu at 40Mhz) on but the "experience" |
27 |
> > > > > > is |
28 |
> > > > > > still |
29 |
> > > > > > the same; it takes about the same time to boot, the same |
30 |
> > > > > > time |
31 |
> > > > > > (or |
32 |
> > > > > > even slower) to load a program. It seems the faster the |
33 |
> > > > > > computer |
34 |
> > > > > > the more I have to wait for it to finish some task. |
35 |
> > > > > > Contradictory, |
36 |
> > > > > > no? Wonder why that is... (bloat?). |
37 |
> > > > > |
38 |
> > > > > Believe it or not but I bet you're not doing the same tasks |
39 |
> > > > > with |
40 |
> > > > > your |
41 |
> > > > > modern machine and could just not run the user-end software |
42 |
> > > > > you |
43 |
> > > > > use |
44 |
> > > > > today on a Amiga 4000 with a 68040 cpu at 40Mhz because they |
45 |
> > > > > learn |
46 |
> > > > > new |
47 |
> > > > > feature since then. |
48 |
> > > > : |
49 |
> > > > :-) Example: |
50 |
> > > > Try run a browser on that Amiga. I doubt it would even manage to |
51 |
> > > > display the Gentoo logo at http://www.gentoo.org. |
52 |
> > > |
53 |
> > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Origyn_Web_Browser |
54 |
> > |
55 |
> > and I am sure that it will display pngs and jpegs with full colours just |
56 |
> > fine. I am sure displaying 2 or 4 MP pictures will be working great. |
57 |
> > Just |
58 |
> > like the mpeg4 you are trying to watch. Or the ogv. |
59 |
> |
60 |
> I don't think so :) |
61 |
> But it is a web-browser, that runs on classic amiga os and I really think, |
62 |
> that it can display http://www.gentoo.org just fine. |
63 |
|
64 |
so can lynx. Does it make it usefull with todays internet? There are more |
65 |
pages than just gentoo.org - The Sun for example or CNN or other high quality |
66 |
sites. |
67 |
|
68 |
|
69 |
-- |
70 |
#163933 |