| 1 |
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 1:43 PM, Volker Armin Hemmann |
| 2 |
<volkerarmin@××××××××××.com> wrote: |
| 3 |
> Am Montag 19 September 2011, 19:25:28 schrieb Michael Schreckenbauer: |
| 4 |
>> On Monday, 19. September 2011 18:36:18 Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: |
| 5 |
>> > Am Montag 19 September 2011, 16:41:08 schrieb Michael Schreckenbauer: |
| 6 |
>> > > On Monday, 19. September 2011 16:22:31 Alan McKinnon wrote: |
| 7 |
>> > > > On Mon, 19 Sep 2011 10:30:41 +0200 |
| 8 |
>> > > > |
| 9 |
>> > > > Nicolas Sebrecht <nsebrecht@×××××.fr> wrote: |
| 10 |
>> > > > > The 17/09/11, pk wrote: |
| 11 |
>> > > > > > dbus is installed in my system, but only because I run |
| 12 |
>> > > > > > Xfce4 |
| 13 |
>> > > > > > (I |
| 14 |
>> > > > > > am |
| 15 |
>> > > > > > thinking of installing something else due to it's |
| 16 |
>> > > > > > becoming |
| 17 |
>> > > > > > bloated |
| 18 |
>> > > > > > just like gnome). And I have "-dbus" in my global |
| 19 |
>> > > > > > make.conf. |
| 20 |
>> > > > > > |
| 21 |
>> > > > > > PS. I am quite astonished at the fact that I have a |
| 22 |
>> > > > > > computer |
| 23 |
>> > > > > > that is |
| 24 |
>> > > > > > _way_ faster than the first machine I installed |
| 25 |
>> > > > > > GNU/Linux |
| 26 |
>> > > > > > (an |
| 27 |
>> > > > > > Amiga |
| 28 |
>> > > > > > 4000 with a 68040 cpu at 40Mhz) on but the "experience" |
| 29 |
>> > > > > > is |
| 30 |
>> > > > > > still |
| 31 |
>> > > > > > the same; it takes about the same time to boot, the same |
| 32 |
>> > > > > > time |
| 33 |
>> > > > > > (or |
| 34 |
>> > > > > > even slower) to load a program. It seems the faster the |
| 35 |
>> > > > > > computer |
| 36 |
>> > > > > > the more I have to wait for it to finish some task. |
| 37 |
>> > > > > > Contradictory, |
| 38 |
>> > > > > > no? Wonder why that is... (bloat?). |
| 39 |
>> > > > > |
| 40 |
>> > > > > Believe it or not but I bet you're not doing the same tasks |
| 41 |
>> > > > > with |
| 42 |
>> > > > > your |
| 43 |
>> > > > > modern machine and could just not run the user-end software |
| 44 |
>> > > > > you |
| 45 |
>> > > > > use |
| 46 |
>> > > > > today on a Amiga 4000 with a 68040 cpu at 40Mhz because they |
| 47 |
>> > > > > learn |
| 48 |
>> > > > > new |
| 49 |
>> > > > > feature since then. |
| 50 |
>> > > > : |
| 51 |
>> > > > :-) Example: |
| 52 |
>> > > > Try run a browser on that Amiga. I doubt it would even manage to |
| 53 |
>> > > > display the Gentoo logo at http://www.gentoo.org. |
| 54 |
>> > > |
| 55 |
>> > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Origyn_Web_Browser |
| 56 |
>> > |
| 57 |
>> > and I am sure that it will display pngs and jpegs with full colours just |
| 58 |
>> > fine. I am sure displaying 2 or 4 MP pictures will be working great. |
| 59 |
>> > Just |
| 60 |
>> > like the mpeg4 you are trying to watch. Or the ogv. |
| 61 |
>> |
| 62 |
>> I don't think so :) |
| 63 |
>> But it is a web-browser, that runs on classic amiga os and I really think, |
| 64 |
>> that it can display http://www.gentoo.org just fine. |
| 65 |
> |
| 66 |
> so can lynx. Does it make it usefull with todays internet? There are more |
| 67 |
> pages than just gentoo.org - The Sun for example or CNN or other high quality |
| 68 |
> sites. |
| 69 |
|
| 70 |
Did you even read the WP link noted? |
| 71 |
|
| 72 |
-- |
| 73 |
:wq |
Archives