| 1 |
On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 10:47 AM, <meino.cramer@×××.de> wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> Hi, |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> I googled down some - often fairly outdated - texts about "the |
| 6 |
> best filesystem" fpr a Linux box. Other texts focussed on |
| 7 |
> uses, which do not aplly to me: Fileservers, webservers, database |
| 8 |
> machines etc. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> Wnat I want is a fast and stable (!) filesystem for a desktop PC |
| 11 |
> with one 1TByte harddisk. Since using Gentoo and a lot of sources |
| 12 |
> I do compile very often "bigger things" (blender-2.50 for example). |
| 13 |
> Another thing: Due to my experimenting it is possible that I have to |
| 14 |
> reboot "hard", which means, the filesystem will be unmounted not |
| 15 |
> cleanly ("dirty" do to say...;) The choosen filesystem should be |
| 16 |
> good in recovering such thing. |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> I am currently using a vanilla 2.6.32.10 kernel. |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> The question, what remains is: What choose should I make? |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> I thank you very much in advance for any help! |
| 23 |
> Best regards, |
| 24 |
> mcc |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
This doesn't address why you would choose one over another but it was |
| 28 |
a recent view of Reiser4 vs a couple of others. |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=reiser4_benchmarks&num=1 |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
I'm way behind. I haven't even tried ext4 yet! |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
Good luck, |
| 35 |
Mark |
Archives