Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: "Sven Köhler" <skoehler@×××.de>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: SCSI/libata based PATA support
Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2006 14:30:50
Message-Id: ej7arb$tvm$1@sea.gmane.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] SCSI/libata based PATA support by "Hemmann
1 >> do you know, what's going on at present in kernel development? We had
2 >> libata based SATA drivers for a few kernel-versions now.
3 >> Since 2.6.19, we seem to be offered libata based PATA drivers too!
4 >>
5 >> Why are they doing it? Does this make any sense to you? The new drivers
6 >> don't replace the old ones, at present time. But are they planned to? Or
7 >> do they just exist "for the fun of it" ?
8 >
9 > yes, they will replace the old drivers at some point in the future.
10 >
11 > And they don't exist just for the fun of it. ide is in a horrible state for
12 > many, many years. And every attempt to 'fix' it, went very wrong. libpata is
13 > the latest attempt to clean up the mess. What do we get? Hopefully better
14 > drivers, better error handling, better powermanagment support.
15
16 I see! very nice ...
17
18 But with the new drivers, you can't enable/disable DMA (yet) etc.
19 Well, but they work nice, as far as i can tell.

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature