1 |
On Thu, 2011-01-06 at 14:46 -0600, Dale wrote: |
2 |
> kashani wrote: |
3 |
> > On 1/5/2011 12:04 AM, Thanasis wrote: |
4 |
> >> I think you should prefer openntpd over ntpd, because I think openntpd |
5 |
> >> is developed by openbsd, which means more secure ... |
6 |
> >> |
7 |
> > |
8 |
> > I tried openntp a couple years ago. It was a giant pain in the |
9 |
> > ass. IIRC it was combination of crap defaults, poor docs, and plain |
10 |
> > not working. I think this was over five years ago and doubtfully thing |
11 |
> > have improved, but I definitely wasn't impressed at the time. |
12 |
> > |
13 |
> > kashani |
14 |
> > |
15 |
> > |
16 |
> |
17 |
> It is a basic program for sure. Commands that I used before with ntp |
18 |
> were missing. The plain ntp has a lot more options and more commands |
19 |
> for seeing what is going on while openntp does not have much. |
20 |
> |
21 |
> I think either would work here if I didn't have some underlying issue |
22 |
> somewhere. |
23 |
> |
24 |
> Dale |
25 |
> |
26 |
> :-) :-) |
27 |
> |
28 |
|
29 |
Dale, can you post (a sanitised) version of what 'ntpq -p' gives after |
30 |
ntpd has been running for some time, and the sanitised result of |
31 |
'ntptrace. Also include your full (sanitised) ntp.conf |
32 |
and /etc/conf.d/ntpd. |
33 |
|
34 |
This might help us see more detail of what is happening. |
35 |
|
36 |
BillK |
37 |
|
38 |
* sanitised - obfuscate public IP's only. |
39 |
|
40 |
-- |
41 |
William Kenworthy <billk@×××××××××.au> |
42 |
Home in Perth! |