1 |
Neil Bothwick wrote: |
2 |
> On Thu, 24 Jan 2013 03:17:06 -0600, Dale wrote: |
3 |
> |
4 |
>> What Bruce was saying is this. When you use --ask, you can look at the |
5 |
>> output of what packages are going to be emerged, what USE flags are |
6 |
>> enabled/disabled/changed and other information that could make a person |
7 |
>> change a setting all before anything is done. If emerge is doing to |
8 |
>> much, to little or some other unwanted thing, you can change it. |
9 |
> |
10 |
> I understand that, but it is not relevant to my point. Using -N includes |
11 |
> packages that do not need emerging. Either you let them emerge or you |
12 |
> filter them out manually, either way is inefficient. Particularly the |
13 |
> manual filtering as they will show up again on the next run. |
14 |
> |
15 |
> Bruce also posted a chained alias he uses, so having to interrupt the |
16 |
> process top manually select packages means running the rest of the |
17 |
> commands manually too. Like Alan says, trust portage to know your system, |
18 |
> let it make the first decision before you review it with --ask. |
19 |
> |
20 |
> The option is there, I find it useful. I really don't care who else uses |
21 |
> itWhat Bruce was saying is this. When you use --ask, you can look at the |
22 |
> output of what packages are going to be emerged, what USE flags are |
23 |
> enabled/disabled/changed and other information that could make a person |
24 |
> change a setting all before anything is done. If emerge is doing to |
25 |
> much, to little or some other unwanted thing, you can change it. |
26 |
> , but I thought I'd mention it in came anyone still using its shotgun |
27 |
> predecessor found the information useful. I am not trying to persuade |
28 |
> anyone else to use it and you won't persuade me to stop using it, neither |
29 |
> is the point of the post. |
30 |
> |
31 |
> It's just occurred to me as I was about to hit Send. If you respond to |
32 |
> emerge --ask with n, it still returns success, so using that in the |
33 |
> middle of a chin of commands is not much help unless you use Ctrl-C |
34 |
> instead of n. |
35 |
> |
36 |
> |
37 |
|
38 |
Why do you say that -N will compile packages that don't need it? If a |
39 |
USE flags is added, changed or whatever, I want that change to be seen |
40 |
and the package to be recompiled. It could very well affect how the |
41 |
package works or some feature. |
42 |
|
43 |
I can see the point on the long command tho. About the longest I get is |
44 |
eix-sync && emerge -uvaDN world. That's about it. I like to type in |
45 |
anything else that needs to be dealt with. As you know, I run into |
46 |
enough problems with upgrades already. LOL |
47 |
|
48 |
Oh, eudev switch went pretty well. I even found a roach in dracut. It |
49 |
seems dracut had a hard dependency on udev itself and not the virtual |
50 |
udev. Now dracut is gone. |
51 |
|
52 |
Dale |
53 |
|
54 |
:-) :-) |
55 |
|
56 |
-- |
57 |
I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you understood or |
58 |
how you interpreted my words! |