| 1 |
Richard Fish wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 4/26/06, Alexander Skwar <listen@×××××××××××××××.name> wrote: |
| 3 |
>> Richard Fish wrote: |
| 4 |
>> > Outlook makes it damn near impossible to properly quote and |
| 5 |
>> > trim a message when replying. |
| 6 |
>> |
| 7 |
>> Actually, it does *NOT* - at least not, when you're composing |
| 8 |
>> text/plain mails, as you should. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> Which version of outlook are you using? |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
OL2003 |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
> I don't want to go completely off-topic and turn this thread into a |
| 15 |
> outlook discussion, but I would like to understand why you and I have |
| 16 |
> such different opinions of outlook. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
It's because of the version. In Outlook 2003, they now, in textmails, |
| 19 |
properly prefix a quoted line with "> " (if so configured). And |
| 20 |
they also allow to easily (ie. without restarting OL) switch between |
| 21 |
textmails and HTML or Richtext - when you compose a mail, you can |
| 22 |
select if you wish to use the plaintext editor, an HTML editor |
| 23 |
or Word. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
The only bad thing still is, that it adds a huge "preamble", like |
| 26 |
this: |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
> -----Original Message----- |
| 29 |
> From: HP Forums [mailto:itrc.forums1@××.com] |
| 30 |
> Sent: Thursday, April 27, 2006 3:27 AM |
| 31 |
> To: undisclosed-recipients |
| 32 |
> Subject: New HP Forum Discussions for Wed Apr 26 17:29:55 EDT 2006 |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
It just sucks, that they still have bad defaults - ie. |
| 35 |
Rich Text and Word as Editor etc.pp. |
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
Alexander Skwar |
| 38 |
-- |
| 39 |
Serenity through viciousness. |
| 40 |
-- |
| 41 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
Archives