1 |
On 13/11/2021 16:52, Rich Freeman wrote: |
2 |
> On Sat, Nov 13, 2021 at 12:35 AM William Kenworthy <billk@×××××××××.au> wrote: |
3 |
>> |
4 |
>> Look at the odroid HC4 - I am using 5x the older HC2 version for moosefs |
5 |
>> - they are USB3 based but work well in this application. They are arm32 |
6 |
>> but 64bit is not needed. |
7 |
> |
8 |
> I like the idea behind the HC series Odroids, but being limited to 1-2 |
9 |
> drives per node seems a bit contraining. With the USB3 approach there |
10 |
> really is no limit to how many drives I can put on a node, as long as |
11 |
> I don't mind the performance drop. I'm more concerned with static |
12 |
> storage capacity in this case. If you're using 1Gbps ethernet then I |
13 |
> guess two drives is already going to saturate the network if they're |
14 |
> able to read sequentially. |
15 |
> |
16 |
Note that the md-raid advice is "do NOT use USB. We don't understand |
17 |
why, but bad things seem to happen". Even when explicitly designed for |
18 |
it, multiplexing drives on a single comms channel isn't always a good |
19 |
idea... |
20 |
|
21 |
Years ago I built a CD copy station. Can't remember the exact layout, |
22 |
but it was something like three CD-writers and a hard drive on PATA-0 |
23 |
and PATA-1. I think the CD-writers achieved something like 0.5x speeds! |
24 |
|
25 |
So we bought two add-in cards, with the hd and first CD-writer were on |
26 |
PATA-0, and one CD-writer each on PATA-1, PATA-2 and PATA-3. They FLEW! |
27 |
They were something like 32x drives and really achieved a full write in |
28 |
about 2 minutes! |
29 |
|
30 |
Cheers, |
31 |
Wol |