| 1 |
On 24/01/13 21:15, Florian Philipp wrote: |
| 2 |
> Am 24.01.2013 18:57, schrieb Jacques Montier: |
| 3 |
>> 2013/1/24 microcai <microcai@×××××××××××××.org |
| 4 |
>> <mailto:microcai@×××××××××××××.org>> |
| 5 |
> [...] |
| 6 |
>> >>>> |
| 7 |
>> >>>> Libreoffice-4.0 needs boost > 1.49 (so works with |
| 8 |
>> boost-1.52.0-r5) and |
| 9 |
>> >>>> Nightshade LSS (for planetarium but not in portage) needs boost |
| 10 |
>> < 1.5 |
| 11 |
>> >>>> (so works with 1.49.0-r2). |
| 12 |
>> >>>> Is it possible to install both 1.49 and 1.52 (in new slot) ? |
| 13 |
>> |
| 14 |
>> update Nightshade to work with boost 1.52 is the only way to go. |
| 15 |
> [...] |
| 16 |
>> I already tried that, but Nightshade doesn't compile with boost-1.52... :-(( |
| 17 |
>> |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> I could rant about the stupidity that is boost and/or packages that |
| 20 |
> depend on it for some time but Flameeyes does a far better job at that. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
I wonder what the view on bundled boost headers is with Gentoo devs. |
| 23 |
I'm currently working on a project where I need boost, and now I'm |
| 24 |
thinking about using BCP |
| 25 |
(http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_52_0/tools/bcp) to bundle what I need |
| 26 |
within the project. At least this would guarantee that the package |
| 27 |
wouldn't be affected by this issue. |
Archives