| 1 |
Am 25.01.2013 20:02, schrieb Nikos Chantziaras: |
| 2 |
> On 24/01/13 21:15, Florian Philipp wrote: |
| 3 |
>> Am 24.01.2013 18:57, schrieb Jacques Montier: |
| 4 |
>>> 2013/1/24 microcai <microcai@×××××××××××××.org |
| 5 |
>>> <mailto:microcai@×××××××××××××.org>> |
| 6 |
>> [...] |
| 7 |
>>> >>>> |
| 8 |
>>> >>>> Libreoffice-4.0 needs boost > 1.49 (so works with |
| 9 |
>>> boost-1.52.0-r5) and |
| 10 |
>>> >>>> Nightshade LSS (for planetarium but not in portage) needs |
| 11 |
>>> boost |
| 12 |
>>> < 1.5 |
| 13 |
>>> >>>> (so works with 1.49.0-r2). |
| 14 |
>>> >>>> Is it possible to install both 1.49 and 1.52 (in new slot) ? |
| 15 |
>>> |
| 16 |
>>> update Nightshade to work with boost 1.52 is the only way to go. |
| 17 |
>> [...] |
| 18 |
>>> I already tried that, but Nightshade doesn't compile with |
| 19 |
>>> boost-1.52... :-(( |
| 20 |
>>> |
| 21 |
>> |
| 22 |
>> I could rant about the stupidity that is boost and/or packages that |
| 23 |
>> depend on it for some time but Flameeyes does a far better job at that. |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
> I wonder what the view on bundled boost headers is with Gentoo devs. I'm |
| 26 |
> currently working on a project where I need boost, and now I'm thinking |
| 27 |
> about using BCP (http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_52_0/tools/bcp) to |
| 28 |
> bundle what I need within the project. At least this would guarantee |
| 29 |
> that the package wouldn't be affected by this issue. |
| 30 |
> |
| 31 |
> |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
As I understand it, bundling the headers is exactly what you are |
| 34 |
supposed to do with boost. |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
Regards, |
| 37 |
Florian Philipp |
Archives