Archives
Archives
| From: | Stroller <stroller@××××××××××××××××××.uk> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-user] emerge @preserved-rebuild EVEN IF some needed package is masked | ||
| Date: | Sun, 10 Jan 2010 21:42:00 | ||
| Message-Id: | 73AD2AEF-53BF-4B9E-AD44-BD6BE5D63BE5@stellar.eclipse.co.uk | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-user] emerge @preserved-rebuild EVEN IF some needed package is masked by Neil Bothwick |
||
| 1 | On 10 Jan 2010, at 19:05, Neil Bothwick wrote: |
| 2 | >> ... |
| 3 | >> Most reasonable people |
| 4 | >> agree that KDE should have supported KDE 3 for at least a few more |
| 5 | >> months. |
| 6 | > |
| 7 | > Do you have a citation for that? Preferably one that doesn't define |
| 8 | > reasonable people as those that think KDE 3.5 should still be |
| 9 | > developed :) |
| 10 | |
| 11 | reasonable people = those who agree with me. |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-user] emerge @preserved-rebuild EVEN IF some needed package is masked | Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk> |
| Re: [gentoo-user] emerge @preserved-rebuild EVEN IF some needed package is masked | Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com> |