Archives
Archives
| From: | Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-user] emerge @preserved-rebuild EVEN IF some needed package is masked | ||
| Date: | Sun, 10 Jan 2010 23:45:19 | ||
| Message-Id: | 4B4A6689.7000505@gmail.com | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-user] emerge @preserved-rebuild EVEN IF some needed package is masked by Stroller |
||
| 1 | Stroller wrote: |
| 2 | > |
| 3 | > On 10 Jan 2010, at 19:05, Neil Bothwick wrote: |
| 4 | >>> ... |
| 5 | >>> Most reasonable people |
| 6 | >>> agree that KDE should have supported KDE 3 for at least a few more |
| 7 | >>> months. |
| 8 | >> |
| 9 | >> Do you have a citation for that? Preferably one that doesn't define |
| 10 | >> reasonable people as those that think KDE 3.5 should still be |
| 11 | >> developed :) |
| 12 | > |
| 13 | > reasonable people = those who agree with me. |
| 14 | > |
| 15 | > |
| 16 | |
| 17 | Not really, those who said that BEFORE I started having problems at all. |
| 18 | |
| 19 | Dale |
| 20 | |
| 21 | :-) :-) |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-user] emerge @preserved-rebuild EVEN IF some needed package is masked | Peter Ruskin <peter.ruskin@×××××××××.com> |