1 |
Frank Steinmetzger wrote: |
2 |
> Am Fri, Aug 26, 2022 at 06:26:39AM -0500 schrieb Dale: |
3 |
> |
4 |
>> I looked into the Raspberry and the newest version, about $150 now, |
5 |
>> doesn't even have SATA ports. I can add a thing called a "hat" I think |
6 |
>> that adds a couple but thing is, that costs more and still isn't |
7 |
>> enough. |
8 |
> I run a raspi with some basic services, most importantly a pihole DNS filter |
9 |
> and a PIM server. But I find it hacky-patchy with its flimsy USB power cable |
10 |
> poking out of the side. I’d prefer a more sturdy construction, which is why |
11 |
> I bought a NAS-style PC (zotac zbox nano with a passive 6 W Celeron). But |
12 |
> that thing is so fast for every-day computing that I actually put a KDE |
13 |
> system on it and now I don’t want to “downgrade” it to a mere server. |
14 |
> |
15 |
|
16 |
|
17 |
I googled that little guy and that is a pretty neat little machine. |
18 |
Basically it is a tiny puter but really tiny, just not tiny on |
19 |
features. The Zotac systems, even some older ones, are pretty nifty. I |
20 |
think I read they have a ITX mobo which is really compact. It sort of |
21 |
reminds me of a cell phone. Small but fast CPUs, some even have decent |
22 |
amounts of ram so they can handle quite a lot. Never heard of this |
23 |
thing before. I wouldn't mind having one of those to work as my OpenVPN |
24 |
server thingy. I'd just need to find one that has 2 ethernet ports and |
25 |
designed for that sort of task. |
26 |
|
27 |
|
28 |
>> I have a old computer that I might could use. It is 4 core something |
29 |
>> and I think it has 4GBs of memory, maxed out. I think it will perform |
30 |
>> well enough but wish it had a little more horses in it. |
31 |
> An Intel Celeron from the Haswell generation (i.e. 8+ years old) did not |
32 |
> have AES-NI yet, and it reached around 160 MB/s encryption speed. I tried |
33 |
> it, because I had dealings with those processors in the past before I built |
34 |
> my own NAS. Your old tech may still be usable, but please also consider |
35 |
> power cost and its impact on the environment if it runs 24/7. |
36 |
|
37 |
I'm not real sure what that old machine has. I have Linux, can't recall |
38 |
the distro tho, on it. Is there a way to find out if it supports the |
39 |
needed things? Since I'd mostly be using it as a backup system, it |
40 |
won't run all the time. I usually do backups on weekends when I update |
41 |
the OS. Recently tho, since the internet is so fast, I have done it |
42 |
twice a week. Just keep in mind, all this is encrypted. |
43 |
|
44 |
|
45 |
>> I looked at something called ITX but they have only one PCIe slot |
46 |
>> usually. That's not enough. I'd like to have two 6 or 8 port SATA |
47 |
>> cards. Then balance the drives on each. I think some of the through |
48 |
>> put is shared so the more drives on it, the slower it can be. I'd like |
49 |
>> to have two such cards. 12 or 16 drives should be enough to last a |
50 |
>> while. |
51 |
>> |
52 |
>> Part of me wants to do RAID but not sure about that. |
53 |
> Dealing with so many drives, I think there’s no getting around RAID. All |
54 |
> drives fail. The more drives you have, the earlier the first failure. With |
55 |
> that many drives, I wouldn’t want to handle syncs between them by hand in |
56 |
> order to get redundancy or backups of backups. |
57 |
> |
58 |
|
59 |
It's a step I need to take but I have to accumulate the needed drives |
60 |
first. I'm getting there tho, slowly. |
61 |
|
62 |
|
63 |
>> While I don't think I need a super powerful machine, I do want enough |
64 |
>> that it will perform well. |
65 |
> The question is: what do you need it to perform? If it’s just storing and |
66 |
> serving files, save the bucks and use any low-end x86 processor with AES |
67 |
> instructions. My NAS first ran on the above mentioned Celeron, but later I |
68 |
> did upgrade to a low-power i3 (because the case¹ is very cramped, I don’t |
69 |
> want too much heat in there). It is a dual-core with SMT and AES at 35 W. |
70 |
> IIRC, it can encrypt around 800-something MB/s. And that is an old i3-4170. |
71 |
> Modern chips are most probably much faster still. |
72 |
> |
73 |
>> I may use actual NAS software too. |
74 |
> What is “actual NAS software”? Do you mean a NAS distribution? From my |
75 |
> understanding, those distros install the usual services (samba, ftp, etc.) |
76 |
> and develop a nice web frontend for it. But since those are web |
77 |
> applications, there isn’t much to be gained from march=native. |
78 |
> |
79 |
> I still run Gentoo on my NAS, just for the old habit and because it comes |
80 |
> with ZFS right out of the box. But the services I still configure the |
81 |
> classical way – ssh, vim and config files. |
82 |
|
83 |
I've seen TrueNAS, OpenNas I think and others. Plus some just use |
84 |
Ubuntu or something. Honestly, almost any linux distro with no or a |
85 |
minimal GUI would work. |
86 |
|
87 |
|
88 |
>> I'm sure Gentoo would work to with proper tweaking but then I need to |
89 |
>> deal with compiling things. Of course, no libreoffice or anything big so |
90 |
>> it may not be to bad. Thing is, the NAS software will likely be more |
91 |
>> efficient since it is designed for the purpose. |
92 |
> More efficient than what? |
93 |
> |
94 |
> My NAS is powered up every few weeks or often months. And then the first |
95 |
> thing I do is—of cours—a world update. And as you mentioned, the install |
96 |
> base is rather small. No graphical stuff whatsoever (server board, small |
97 |
> ASMedia VGA chip on-board, no Intel graphics). The biggest pkgs are gcc |
98 |
> (around 2 hours build time) and llvm. The rest is user land stuff that helps |
99 |
> me in dealing with the media files the NAS serves. Mkvtoolnix is a compile |
100 |
> hog at around half an hour. |
101 |
|
102 |
I figure something like OpenNAS or TrueNAS would work better as it is |
103 |
built to be user friendly and has tools by default to manage things. |
104 |
I'm pretty sure they support RAID and such by default. It is likely set |
105 |
up to make setting it up easier too. |
106 |
|
107 |
|
108 |
>> I just know I need a proper machine for the task. I'm getting lots of |
109 |
>> data fast now. I hit the 80% mark overnight. At 90%, I consider it |
110 |
>> critical. Something must be done soon. |
111 |
> How about watching the spoils for a change instead of only ever downloading |
112 |
> it? ;-) |
113 |
> |
114 |
> |
115 |
> ¹ https://www.inter-tech.de/en/products/ipc/storage-cases/sc-4100 |
116 |
|
117 |
|
118 |
I've likely watched everything I download at least twice. I admit, I |
119 |
like things from back in the 70s, 80s and such quite a lot. Most shows |
120 |
today are just trash, I'm trying to be polite. ;-) |
121 |
|
122 |
Thanks for the info. Especially the little tiny Zotack thing. One neat |
123 |
little machine. |
124 |
|
125 |
Dale |
126 |
|
127 |
:-) :-) |