Archives
Archives
| From: | Stroller <stroller@××××××××××××××××××.uk> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-user] Has semantic-desktop really become compulsatory for kmail? | ||
| Date: | Sat, 13 Feb 2010 18:55:11 | ||
| Message-Id: | E07A122D-5628-4AA1-83B8-8282CCF64357@stellar.eclipse.co.uk | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-user] Has semantic-desktop really become compulsatory for kmail? by Dale |
||
| 1 | On 13 Feb 2010, at 15:42, Dale wrote: |
| 2 | >> ... |
| 3 | >> Btw, do you have a car? But certainly you drive stick. |
| 4 | >> Unsyncronized. Because |
| 5 | >> everything else is 'bloat'. ... |
| 6 | > |
| 7 | > P. S. I also drive a stick. I don't like the repair rates or costs |
| 8 | > on automatic transmissions. |
| 9 | |
| 10 | Except your manual gearbox probably has a synchronised (synchromesh?) |
| 11 | transmission. |
| 12 | |
| 13 | http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manual_transmission#Unsynchronized_transmission |
| 14 | |
| 15 | Stroller. |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-user] Has semantic-desktop really become compulsatory for kmail? | Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com> |