1 |
On Wednesday 22 September 2010 11:13:01 Jake Moe wrote: |
2 |
> On 09/22/10 17:16, J. Roeleveld wrote: |
3 |
> > On Wednesday 22 September 2010 06:36:50 Jake Moe wrote: |
4 |
> > |
5 |
> > <snipped> |
6 |
> > |
7 |
> >> Well, now that I've managed to get it booting, the only problem is that |
8 |
> >> I can't seem to get the disk label working right. In GRUB's menu.lst, |
9 |
> >> if I use root=LABEL=UsbRoot, it doesn't work (kernel panic, label not |
10 |
> >> found, but sda1 is listed as available), but if I use root=/dev/sda1, it |
11 |
> >> works. However, later in the boot process, it mounts / using |
12 |
> >> LABEL=UsbRoot in fstab just fine. Is that a problem with GRUB? Or the |
13 |
> >> kernel? Or am I doing something else wrong? |
14 |
> > |
15 |
> > I think someone mentioned earlier in this thread that "label" support for |
16 |
> > boot requires an initrd (ramdisk) to work. This could be what you're |
17 |
> > running into? |
18 |
> |
19 |
> Quite possibly. I seem to be reading the same thing, but I thought I |
20 |
> had heard from the list previously that it was possible. |
21 |
> |
22 |
> Actually, I've just found the e-mail I was thinking of before: Alan |
23 |
> McKinnon's reply on 08/31/10 02:32 with the subject "Re: [gentoo-user] |
24 |
> Re: Old IDE drives and the "newer" PATA kernel drivers" in which he said |
25 |
> that he's always used labels and never needed an initramfs to make it |
26 |
> work. So I might have to fiddle with it some more and see if I can't |
27 |
> get it working. |
28 |
|
29 |
I haven't used labels for that, so I don't know what is needed for that. |
30 |
Maybe a kernel-config setting? |
31 |
|
32 |
> >> And for future reference, while looking into various things for this, I |
33 |
> >> found these in the Gentoo Wiki: |
34 |
> >> USB Portable Install - |
35 |
> >> http://en.gentoo-wiki.com/wiki/USB_Portable_Install Portable USB Gentoo |
36 |
> >> - http://en.gentoo-wiki.com/wiki/Portable_USB_Gentoo |
37 |
> >> |
38 |
> >> Unfortunately, both use genkernel instead of manually configured |
39 |
> >> kernels, so that part doesn't help, but one mentions the option |
40 |
> >> "scandelay=2" to add to the kernel boot line in GRUB to introduce the |
41 |
> >> delay genkernel needed to see the USB device; would have been good to |
42 |
> >> know that last week when I was trying genkernel. :-P |
43 |
> > |
44 |
> > That is something I noticed for a few Howto's, genkernel is used quite |
45 |
> > often, but I actually haven't seen the need for it myself yet. |
46 |
> > |
47 |
> > But I am glad to hear you managed to get it working. |
48 |
> > Did you try trimming down your kernel a bit more to see what the minimum |
49 |
> > required is? :) |
50 |
> > |
51 |
> > -- |
52 |
> > Joost |
53 |
> |
54 |
> No, I'm still trying to get a basic system up and running. After I |
55 |
> booted into it, I tried to install v86d so I could try to get a |
56 |
> framebuffer working and have more lines on my screen while I try to trim |
57 |
> things down. However, I quickly ran into an "out of space" issue, which |
58 |
> I found out was because of inodes, not size. So I had to copy the |
59 |
> contents off, re-make the partition with more inodes, and then copy the |
60 |
> data back on. Since then, I haven't had a chance to boot it and see how |
61 |
> it's going. Hope to tomorrow. |
62 |
|
63 |
Ouch :( |
64 |
|
65 |
I'm usually a bit astumped when I get "out-of-space" issues and "df" still |
66 |
shows plenty of free disk space. |
67 |
|
68 |
Looking forward to your update :) |
69 |
|
70 |
-- |
71 |
Joost |
72 |
|
73 |
PS. Am thinking of playing around with that myself again sometime :) |