| 1 |
wabenbau@×××××.com wrote: |
| 2 |
> Alan Grimes <ALONZOTG@×××××××.net> wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
>> Philip Webb wrote: |
| 5 |
>> |
| 6 |
>>> So that needs rephrasing : "Why is AG using KDE 5 ? " (smile). |
| 7 |
>>> Everything works for me using Fluxbox + some KDE 4 apps. |
| 8 |
>> The last good version of KDE was 3.5.x... then the flood came... (Qt |
| 9 |
>> 4) and all the developer started having Ideas about things that could |
| 10 |
>> go into the new version.... |
| 11 |
> Also IMHO KDE 3.5 was the best (K)DE. :-) |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> But I can't envisage that KDE will ever reach that quality again. |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> -- |
| 16 |
> Regards |
| 17 |
> wabe |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
You two just said a mouth full and I agree. That last part of KDE3 was |
| 23 |
some good stuff. To this day, I still can't get my desktop slide show |
| 24 |
to *not* be random. I filed a bug way back when KDE3 forced folks to |
| 25 |
move to KDE4. I can see how making it random may require some work but |
| 26 |
disabling it shouldn't take to much work. Just beat the random thing |
| 27 |
until it dies. lol |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
That's just one thing tho. KDE3 was much faster in my opinion. |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
Dale |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
:-) :-) |
Archives