| 1 |
Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> wabenbau@×××××.com wrote: |
| 4 |
> > Alan Grimes <ALONZOTG@×××××××.net> wrote: |
| 5 |
> > |
| 6 |
> >> Philip Webb wrote: |
| 7 |
> >> |
| 8 |
> >>> So that needs rephrasing : "Why is AG using KDE 5 ? " (smile). |
| 9 |
> >>> Everything works for me using Fluxbox + some KDE 4 apps. |
| 10 |
> >> The last good version of KDE was 3.5.x... then the flood came... |
| 11 |
> >> (Qt 4) and all the developer started having Ideas about things |
| 12 |
> >> that could go into the new version.... |
| 13 |
> > Also IMHO KDE 3.5 was the best (K)DE. :-) |
| 14 |
> > |
| 15 |
> > But I can't envisage that KDE will ever reach that quality again. |
| 16 |
> > |
| 17 |
> > -- |
| 18 |
> > Regards |
| 19 |
> > wabe |
| 20 |
> > |
| 21 |
> > |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
> You two just said a mouth full and I agree. That last part of KDE3 |
| 25 |
> was some good stuff. To this day, I still can't get my desktop slide |
| 26 |
> show to *not* be random. I filed a bug way back when KDE3 forced |
| 27 |
> folks to move to KDE4. I can see how making it random may require |
| 28 |
> some work but disabling it shouldn't take to much work. Just beat |
| 29 |
> the random thing until it dies. lol |
| 30 |
> |
| 31 |
> That's just one thing tho. KDE3 was much faster in my opinion. |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
What I miss most of all is the fantastic konqueror. It was way better |
| 34 |
than any other filemanager that I know. Of course I've tested the KDE4 |
| 35 |
konqueror and also dolphin but it was horrible compared to the old |
| 36 |
konqueror. Now I'm using thunar. It's far away from being perfect, but |
| 37 |
it seems to be the lesser of the evils. ;-) |
| 38 |
|
| 39 |
-- |
| 40 |
Regards |
| 41 |
wabe |
Archives