1 |
In <200906201106.19482.dirk.heinrichs@××××××.de> dirk.heinrichs@××××××.de (Dirk Heinrichs) writes: |
2 |
|
3 |
>--nextPart7888557.vBO4LPOhks |
4 |
>Content-Type: text/plain; |
5 |
> charset="utf-8" |
6 |
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit |
7 |
>Content-Disposition: inline |
8 |
|
9 |
>Am Samstag 20 Juni 2009 10:06:37 schrieb Neil Bothwick: |
10 |
|
11 |
>> I thought that,but reading the question again, I don't think the problem |
12 |
>> is naming, but the wrong driver claiming the card. |
13 |
|
14 |
>Naming makes the order irrelevant. |
15 |
How so? |
16 |
|
17 |
In this case it is eth1 which doesn't work if tulip is loaded before de4x5. |
18 |
I also do not think that building the modules in the kernel gives me any |
19 |
control over the order in which they are discovered. |
20 |
|
21 |
Regads, |
22 |
|
23 |
Konstantin |
24 |
-- |
25 |
Dipl-Inf. Konstantin Agouros aka Elwood Blues. Internet: elwood@×××××××.de |
26 |
Otkerstr. 28, 81547 Muenchen, Germany. Tel +49 89 69370185 |
27 |
---------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
28 |
"Captain, this ship will not survive the forming of the cosmos." B'Elana Torres |