| 1 |
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 3:18 AM, Grant Edwards <grant.b.edwards@×××××.com> |
| 2 |
wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> On 2014-09-18, Alec Ten Harmsel <alec@××××××××××××××.com> wrote: |
| 5 |
> > Mark David Dumlao wrote: |
| 6 |
> >> The code is out there. Freely available. Both systemd and sysvinit. |
| 7 |
> >> If you wanted to measure both, you could, literally, in the time it |
| 8 |
> >> took since you first posted in this thread till now you could have |
| 9 |
> >> measured several times and left mean comments about whichever |
| 10 |
> >> system you hated the most. |
| 11 |
> > |
| 12 |
> > Unfortunately, the systemd guys keep screaming that systemd is faster, |
| 13 |
> > and burden of proof is on the party that's claiming something. It's not |
| 14 |
> > James'/Volker's responsibility to prove that systemd isn't faster. |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> I don't understand all the hoopla about systemd being "faster". |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> Faster at what? |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> Booting? |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> The only Linux systems where I care about boot time are embedded |
| 23 |
> systems which are never going to have the resources needed to run |
| 24 |
> systemd. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
You are mistaken. I've helped a friend debug problems on a couple devices |
| 28 |
running a custom Arch system with systemd. |
| 29 |
-- |
| 30 |
This email is: [ ] actionable [ ] fyi [ ] social |
| 31 |
Response needed: [ ] yes [ ] up to you [ ] no |
| 32 |
Time-sensitive: [ ] immediate [ ] soon [ ] none |
Archives