1 |
On 2014-09-18, Alec Ten Harmsel <alec@××××××××××××××.com> wrote: |
2 |
> Mark David Dumlao wrote: |
3 |
>> The code is out there. Freely available. Both systemd and sysvinit. |
4 |
>> If you wanted to measure both, you could, literally, in the time it |
5 |
>> took since you first posted in this thread till now you could have |
6 |
>> measured several times and left mean comments about whichever |
7 |
>> system you hated the most. |
8 |
> |
9 |
> Unfortunately, the systemd guys keep screaming that systemd is faster, |
10 |
> and burden of proof is on the party that's claiming something. It's not |
11 |
> James'/Volker's responsibility to prove that systemd isn't faster. |
12 |
|
13 |
I don't understand all the hoopla about systemd being "faster". |
14 |
|
15 |
Faster at what? |
16 |
|
17 |
Booting? |
18 |
|
19 |
The only Linux systems where I care about boot time are embedded |
20 |
systems which are never going to have the resources needed to run |
21 |
systemd. As for normal desktop machines, who cares? I only reboot |
22 |
them once every month or two (when I'm bored and want to make sure |
23 |
they will still boot up after updates). |
24 |
|
25 |
My laptop(s) get booted a lot more often than desktops, but the boot |
26 |
times have never been an issue. |
27 |
|
28 |
The other thing I keep hearing from systemd proponents is stuff about |
29 |
how it allows you to parallelize startup. I don't _want_ stuff |
30 |
starting up in parallel -- that just makes it all the more difficult |
31 |
to troubleshoot problems. I want things to start up one at a time, in |
32 |
a determined order. |
33 |
|
34 |
-- |
35 |
Grant Edwards grant.b.edwards Yow! The FALAFEL SANDWICH |
36 |
at lands on my HEAD and I |
37 |
gmail.com become a VEGETARIAN ... |