| 1 |
Mark David Dumlao wrote: |
| 2 |
> The code is out there. Freely available. Both systemd and sysvinit. |
| 3 |
> If you wanted to measure both, you could, literally, in the time it |
| 4 |
> took since you first posted in this thread till now you could have |
| 5 |
> measured several times and left mean comments about whichever |
| 6 |
> system you hated the most. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
Unfortunately, the systemd guys keep screaming that systemd is faster, |
| 9 |
and burden of proof is on the party that's claiming something. It's not |
| 10 |
James'/Volker's responsibility to prove that systemd isn't faster. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
That said, you guys need to stop flaming. If anything, it's easy to |
| 13 |
dislike SysVInit because the init scripts it uses are piles of bash, |
| 14 |
compared to a Systemd init script that has a handful of systemd config. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Is systemd starting to encompass too much? I think so, but who cares? If |
| 17 |
we want an init manager that reads systemd-like files but doesn't do |
| 18 |
anything else (hostnamectl, logging, udev, etc.), I guess we'll have to |
| 19 |
make one. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Alec |
Archives