1 |
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 7:11 AM, James <wireless@×××××××××××.com> wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> Mark David Dumlao <madumlao <at> gmail.com> writes: |
4 |
> > You're the only one in this thread that's imposing on everyone |
5 |
> > to produce anything. You're the only one in this thread that |
6 |
> > SHOULD be producing anything. That's how open source works and |
7 |
> > that's how it's supposed to work. We're not your unpaid researchers. |
8 |
> |
9 |
> I'm sorry, Volker pointed out that the pro systemd folks came to |
10 |
> gentoo-user, waiving linux's dirty panties around. We ask a few |
11 |
> simple questions, now you result to name calling? |
12 |
> |
13 |
|
14 |
There is no "gentoo-user separate from pro systemd folks". You made that |
15 |
up. "pro systemd folks" have been part of gentoo user for years and years |
16 |
now, and they've been harassed repeatedly with "simple" loaded questions |
17 |
based on wrong assumptions for years and years now. |
18 |
|
19 |
You know all those bits I mentioned to Volker about people getting FHS |
20 |
wrong, or not bothering to read man pages, or not giving a crap what an |
21 |
"init thingy" was and throwing public tantrums on it? I didn't make those |
22 |
up. They're here, on this list, and I've had to wade in that crap for a few |
23 |
years, and even in those threads where I only intended to give practical |
24 |
advice like "if you want to load udev earlier, you could write an init |
25 |
script for it..." or something to that effect. Only to be heaped by |
26 |
plateful after plateful of vitriolic, _technically empty_ crap and |
27 |
callbacks to Unix platitudes half the sayers don't even understand that |
28 |
well. |
29 |
|
30 |
Fact of the matter is systemd isn't "invading gentoo", it's part of it now, |
31 |
and has been for quite a while. All those big changes many people have been |
32 |
sore about on this list could have been turned into complete non-problems |
33 |
if we took all the smart-brains time spent arguing this point to instead |
34 |
write integration packages the way Canek did. |
35 |
-- |
36 |
This email is: [ ] actionable [ ] fyi [ ] social |
37 |
Response needed: [ ] yes [ ] up to you [ ] no |
38 |
Time-sensitive: [ ] immediate [ ] soon [ ] none |