1 |
Mark David Dumlao <madumlao <at> gmail.com> writes: |
2 |
|
3 |
|
4 |
perfomanced metrics; Choice; Unreasonable? |
5 |
|
6 |
|
7 |
> > work on publicly available data |
8 |
|
9 |
> > Ah, here is some of the tesing you are referring |
10 |
to?http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/systemd-devel/2014-March/017570.html |
11 |
|
12 |
> My position is that you're an idiot and a troll. |
13 |
> |
14 |
> The code is out there. Freely available. Both systemd and sysvinit. If |
15 |
> you wanted to measure both, you could, literally, in the time it |
16 |
> took since you first posted in this thread till now you could |
17 |
> have measured several times and left mean comments about whichever |
18 |
> system you hated the most. |
19 |
|
20 |
This like compares kdbus to a test code ibench. It already done. |
21 |
Since you are so wise and I so, well limited, why don't you |
22 |
explain how the upcoming kdbus is giong to be faster? |
23 |
|
24 |
Speed in the kernel is important? |
25 |
|
26 |
|
27 |
> You're the only one in this thread that's imposing on everyone |
28 |
> to produce anything. You're the only one in this thread that |
29 |
> SHOULD be producing anything. That's how open source works and |
30 |
> that's how it's supposed to work. We're not your unpaid researchers. |
31 |
|
32 |
I'm sorry, Volker pointed out that the pro systemd folks came to |
33 |
gentoo-user, waiving linux's dirty panties around. We ask a few |
34 |
simple questions, now you result to name calling? |
35 |
|
36 |
Benchmarking lowlevel effects in the kernel is not new. Important |
37 |
changes are frequently marketed to the rest of the technical user |
38 |
community, by " gee guys look how fast kdbus is going to be" |
39 |
|
40 |
So, take your panties off, and show us just how fast you are? |
41 |
systemd + kdbus? |
42 |
|
43 |
|
44 |
Other *udev projects you would recommend? |
45 |
I accept your sceptre, but you must illuminate things a bit. |
46 |
|
47 |
|
48 |
<hugs and kisses?> |
49 |
James |