1 |
Am 18.09.2014 um 01:24 schrieb Mark David Dumlao: |
2 |
> On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 7:11 AM, James <wireless@×××××××××××.com |
3 |
> <mailto:wireless@×××××××××××.com>> wrote: |
4 |
> |
5 |
> Mark David Dumlao <madumlao <at> gmail.com <http://gmail.com>> writes: |
6 |
> > You're the only one in this thread that's imposing on everyone |
7 |
> > to produce anything. You're the only one in this thread that |
8 |
> > SHOULD be producing anything. That's how open source works and |
9 |
> > that's how it's supposed to work. We're not your unpaid researchers. |
10 |
> |
11 |
> I'm sorry, Volker pointed out that the pro systemd folks came to |
12 |
> gentoo-user, waiving linux's dirty panties around. We ask a few |
13 |
> simple questions, now you result to name calling? |
14 |
> |
15 |
> |
16 |
> There is no "gentoo-user separate from pro systemd folks". You made |
17 |
> that up. "pro systemd folks" have been part of gentoo user for years |
18 |
> and years now, and they've been harassed repeatedly with "simple" |
19 |
> loaded questions based on wrong assumptions for years and years now. |
20 |
|
21 |
and that makes it fine to constantly spread pro-systemd propaganga? |
22 |
|
23 |
So.. according to your logic, it would be fine to subscribe to systemd |
24 |
mailing lists and constantly post why distri X or application Y is the |
25 |
best of all? |