Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Volker Armin Hemmann <volkerarmin@××××××××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: [OT] Linus Torvalds on systemd
Date: Sat, 20 Sep 2014 16:24:23
Message-Id: 541DAA2D.7050003@googlemail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: [OT] Linus Torvalds on systemd by Mark David Dumlao
1 Am 18.09.2014 um 01:24 schrieb Mark David Dumlao:
2 > On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 7:11 AM, James <wireless@×××××××××××.com
3 > <mailto:wireless@×××××××××××.com>> wrote:
4 >
5 > Mark David Dumlao <madumlao <at> gmail.com <http://gmail.com>> writes:
6 > > You're the only one in this thread that's imposing on everyone
7 > > to produce anything. You're the only one in this thread that
8 > > SHOULD be producing anything. That's how open source works and
9 > > that's how it's supposed to work. We're not your unpaid researchers.
10 >
11 > I'm sorry, Volker pointed out that the pro systemd folks came to
12 > gentoo-user, waiving linux's dirty panties around. We ask a few
13 > simple questions, now you result to name calling?
14 >
15 >
16 > There is no "gentoo-user separate from pro systemd folks". You made
17 > that up. "pro systemd folks" have been part of gentoo user for years
18 > and years now, and they've been harassed repeatedly with "simple"
19 > loaded questions based on wrong assumptions for years and years now.
20
21 and that makes it fine to constantly spread pro-systemd propaganga?
22
23 So.. according to your logic, it would be fine to subscribe to systemd
24 mailing lists and constantly post why distri X or application Y is the
25 best of all?

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: [OT] Linus Torvalds on systemd Mark David Dumlao <madumlao@×××××.com>
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: [OT] Linus Torvalds on systemd "Canek Peláez Valdés" <caneko@×××××.com>