1 |
On Sun, Sep 21, 2014 at 12:24 AM, Volker Armin Hemmann < |
2 |
volkerarmin@××××××××××.com> wrote: |
3 |
|
4 |
> Am 18.09.2014 um 01:24 schrieb Mark David Dumlao: |
5 |
> |
6 |
> On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 7:11 AM, James <wireless@×××××××××××.com> wrote: |
7 |
> |
8 |
>> Mark David Dumlao <madumlao <at> gmail.com> writes: |
9 |
>> > You're the only one in this thread that's imposing on everyone |
10 |
>> > to produce anything. You're the only one in this thread that |
11 |
>> > SHOULD be producing anything. That's how open source works and |
12 |
>> > that's how it's supposed to work. We're not your unpaid researchers. |
13 |
>> |
14 |
>> I'm sorry, Volker pointed out that the pro systemd folks came to |
15 |
>> gentoo-user, waiving linux's dirty panties around. We ask a few |
16 |
>> simple questions, now you result to name calling? |
17 |
>> |
18 |
> |
19 |
> There is no "gentoo-user separate from pro systemd folks". You made that |
20 |
> up. "pro systemd folks" have been part of gentoo user for years and years |
21 |
> now, and they've been harassed repeatedly with "simple" loaded questions |
22 |
> based on wrong assumptions for years and years now. |
23 |
> |
24 |
> |
25 |
> and that makes it fine to constantly spread pro-systemd propaganga? |
26 |
> |
27 |
> So.. according to your logic, it would be fine to subscribe to systemd |
28 |
> mailing lists and constantly post why distri X or application Y is the best |
29 |
> of all? |
30 |
> |
31 |
|
32 |
systemd is in portage you stupid troll, and it has been for years now. |
33 |
|
34 |
-- |
35 |
This email is: [ ] actionable [ ] fyi [ ] social |
36 |
Response needed: [ ] yes [ ] up to you [ ] no |
37 |
Time-sensitive: [ ] immediate [ ] soon [ ] none |