| 1 |
On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 11:24 AM, Volker Armin Hemmann |
| 2 |
<volkerarmin@××××××××××.com> wrote: |
| 3 |
> Am 18.09.2014 um 01:24 schrieb Mark David Dumlao: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 7:11 AM, James <wireless@×××××××××××.com> wrote: |
| 6 |
>> |
| 7 |
>> Mark David Dumlao <madumlao <at> gmail.com> writes: |
| 8 |
>> > You're the only one in this thread that's imposing on everyone |
| 9 |
>> > to produce anything. You're the only one in this thread that |
| 10 |
>> > SHOULD be producing anything. That's how open source works and |
| 11 |
>> > that's how it's supposed to work. We're not your unpaid researchers. |
| 12 |
>> |
| 13 |
>> I'm sorry, Volker pointed out that the pro systemd folks came to |
| 14 |
>> gentoo-user, waiving linux's dirty panties around. We ask a few |
| 15 |
>> simple questions, now you result to name calling? |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> There is no "gentoo-user separate from pro systemd folks". You made that up. |
| 19 |
> "pro systemd folks" have been part of gentoo user for years and years now, |
| 20 |
> and they've been harassed repeatedly with "simple" loaded questions based on |
| 21 |
> wrong assumptions for years and years now. |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
> and that makes it fine to constantly spread pro-systemd propaganga? |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
Just to be clear, I did prefixed the subject with "[OT]", and in the |
| 27 |
first paragraph I clearly stated that this as highly off-topic, and |
| 28 |
systemd related. |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
You could have easily ignored the post, but your bigotry against |
| 31 |
systemd made you post your laughable "arguments". It was *you* who got |
| 32 |
into an explicitly marked off-topic thread. |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
> So.. according to your logic, it would be fine to subscribe to systemd |
| 35 |
> mailing lists and constantly post why distri X or application Y is the best |
| 36 |
> of all? |
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
If you marked it off-topic and was slightly related to systemd (like |
| 39 |
"what distro X or app Y works better with systemd"), I don't think |
| 40 |
nobody would mind. It probably would be mostly ignored, though. |
| 41 |
|
| 42 |
And as Mark has already stated, systemd is part of Gentoo (now for |
| 43 |
several years). Any post related to systemd is slightly related to |
| 44 |
Gentoo, or at least to the many users using it (this is gentoo-user, |
| 45 |
remember?) |
| 46 |
|
| 47 |
I understand that, like a five year old that doesn't want to hear |
| 48 |
about something, you would prefer that nobody *ever* posted anything |
| 49 |
positive about systemd, or GNOME, or PulseAudio, or... man, your |
| 50 |
bigotry is *HUGE*, it even sounds tiring. Anyway; it's not going to |
| 51 |
happen: we will continue to post systemd-related topics in gentoo-user |
| 52 |
if we consider them interesting to at least part of the Gentoo |
| 53 |
community (which several members, including developers, already said |
| 54 |
they did). |
| 55 |
|
| 56 |
So I suggest you to do exactly like a five year old, cover your ears |
| 57 |
and sing LA-LA-LA, because we are here to stay. |
| 58 |
|
| 59 |
Regards. |
| 60 |
-- |
| 61 |
Canek Peláez Valdés |
| 62 |
Profesor de asignatura, Facultad de Ciencias |
| 63 |
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México |
Archives