1 |
=== On Thu, 09/24, walt wrote: === |
2 |
> In other words, disk manufacturers have apparently decided to abandon |
3 |
> strict quality control in favor of low price, and seem happy to |
4 |
> replace failed drives as a substitute for quality control. It must |
5 |
> be a profitable strategy because they all seem to be doing it. |
6 |
=== |
7 |
|
8 |
Yes, it's kind of sad. But I guess it makes some sense due the pace of |
9 |
innovation they become obsolete before they usually break. |
10 |
|
11 |
For example, I have some IBM Deskstar disks that are really high |
12 |
quality. They have been running non-stop for 10 years now! It's really |
13 |
amazing. However, they are "only" 9 GB disks that won't even hold a |
14 |
full bells-and-wistles Gentoo installation. |
15 |
|
16 |
|
17 |
-- Keith Dart |
18 |
|
19 |
-- |
20 |
-- -------------------- |
21 |
Keith Dart |
22 |
<keith@×××××××××.biz> |
23 |
======================= |