| 1 |
On 04/17/2011 05:32 PM, Carlos Sura wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> On 17 April 2011 16:14, walt <w41ter@×××××.com <mailto:w41ter@×××××.com>> wrote: |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> On 04/17/2011 11:38 AM, Carlos Sura wrote: |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> But, trying as a normal user, isn't working and I dont have any clue |
| 10 |
> about what is making this problem, there is no log or error to |
| 11 |
> trace. |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> So, I've unistalled libreoffice, and installed again, but... Isn't |
| 14 |
> working yet... I'm not really sure what's this problem, since I don't |
| 15 |
> have any clue or any idea to trace this error. |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> Try strace this way (as normal user): |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> $strace -f -o outputfile /usr/bin/libreoffice |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> The -f flag allows strace to follow as the shell-script starts the real |
| 23 |
> binary executable. Look through 'outputfile' for messages that look |
| 24 |
> fatal :) |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
> |
| 28 |
> |
| 29 |
> |
| 30 |
> Hello Walt, thank you for your answer |
| 31 |
> |
| 32 |
> This is the paste: http://tinypaste.com/dde0e1 |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
The trace clearly shows a segfault, which is what you would expect given how |
| 35 |
the program behaves -- but I can't tell what's causing it. Maybe someone else |
| 36 |
can tell us. |
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
I can suggest a few things to check, though. I'd try moving or deleting your |
| 39 |
~/.libreoffice directory to see if something in there is corrupted. If LO |
| 40 |
wants to import old settings from OO try saying no. |
| 41 |
|
| 42 |
I notice you're using iced-tea for java. Have you used java-config-2 to |
| 43 |
make sure it's all set up correctly? Note that the java settings in LO |
| 44 |
need to be edited by hand if you change java versions :(Dumb, but doesn't |
| 45 |
cause a segfault for me.) |
| 46 |
|
| 47 |
Are you running python-3 instead of python-2? |
| 48 |
|
| 49 |
Do you get the same segfault by running /usr/lib64/libreoffice/program/soffice.bin |
| 50 |
directly? |
| 51 |
|
| 52 |
Good idea to create a new (ordinary) user account so you can try failing programs |
| 53 |
with a completely fresh environment -- not at all the same as running something |
| 54 |
as root, of course, and very safe if you use a strong password for the new user. |
| 55 |
|
| 56 |
Out of ideas for the moment. |
Archives