Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Dan Farrell <dan@×××××××××.cx>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] [OT] Again: Critical bugs considered invalid
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 14:58:38
Message-Id: 20070611094803.39741a4d@pascal.spore.ath.cx
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] Again: Critical bugs considered invalid by Kent Fredric
1 On Tue, 12 Jun 2007 01:18:58 +1200
2 "Kent Fredric" <kentfredric@×××××.com> wrote:
3
4 > On 6/11/07, Iain Buchanan <iaindb@××××××××××××.au> wrote:
5 > > On Sat, 2007-06-09 at 21:13 +1200, Kent Fredric wrote:
6 > >
7 > > > Genoo > Everything.
8 > >
9 > > given Everything = Gentoo + Debian + RedHat + ...,
10 > > let EverythingElse = Everything - Gentoo;
11 > >
12 > > then
13 > > Gentoo > Everything
14 > > =~ Gentoo > Gentoo + EverythingElse
15 > > =~ Gentoo - Gentoo > Gentoo + EveryThingElse - Gentoo
16 > > =~ 0 > EverythingElse
17 > > =~ EverythingElse < 0
18 > >
19 > > I agree!
20 >
21 > If that concept is a first, I suggest it go into
22 > fortune-mod-gentoo-forums.
23 >
24 > That is certainly quote worthy imo :D
25
26
27 Oh, I don't know about that... "x > everything" doesn't seem like a
28 very witty way to begin a quotable concept.
29 --
30 gentoo-user@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] [OT] Again: Critical bugs considered invalid Iain Buchanan <iaindb@××××××××××××.au>