| 1 |
On Mon, 2007-06-11 at 09:48 -0500, Dan Farrell wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Tue, 12 Jun 2007 01:18:58 +1200 |
| 3 |
> "Kent Fredric" <kentfredric@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> > On 6/11/07, Iain Buchanan <iaindb@××××××××××××.au> wrote: |
| 6 |
> > > On Sat, 2007-06-09 at 21:13 +1200, Kent Fredric wrote: |
| 7 |
> > > |
| 8 |
> > > > Genoo > Everything. |
| 9 |
> > > |
| 10 |
> > > given Everything = Gentoo + Debian + RedHat + ..., |
| 11 |
> > > let EverythingElse = Everything - Gentoo; |
| 12 |
> > > |
| 13 |
> > > then |
| 14 |
> > > Gentoo > Everything |
| 15 |
> > > =~ Gentoo > Gentoo + EverythingElse |
| 16 |
> > > =~ Gentoo - Gentoo > Gentoo + EveryThingElse - Gentoo |
| 17 |
> > > =~ 0 > EverythingElse |
| 18 |
> > > =~ EverythingElse < 0 |
| 19 |
> > > |
| 20 |
> > > I agree! |
| 21 |
> > |
| 22 |
> > If that concept is a first, I suggest it go into |
| 23 |
> > fortune-mod-gentoo-forums. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
yes, I made it up just then. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
> > That is certainly quote worthy imo :D |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
thanks. |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
> Oh, I don't know about that... "x > everything" doesn't seem like a |
| 32 |
> very witty way to begin a quotable concept. |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
it did of course rely on the "given" by Kent Fredric, whether that is |
| 35 |
provable or not is left as an exercise for the reader :) |
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
cya, |
| 38 |
-- |
| 39 |
Iain Buchanan <iaindb at netspace dot net dot au> |
| 40 |
|
| 41 |
The 357.73 Theory: |
| 42 |
Auditors always reject expense accounts |
| 43 |
with a bottom line divisible by 5. |
| 44 |
|
| 45 |
-- |
| 46 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
Archives