1 |
On Tuesday 02 September 2008 22:26:08 Florian Philipp wrote: |
2 |
> Alan McKinnon schrieb: |
3 |
> > On Tuesday 02 September 2008 21:14:25 Florian Philipp wrote: |
4 |
> >> You should also consider putting them near the beginning of the disk. |
5 |
> >> You can do this by booting a live-CD and use gparted to move your |
6 |
> >> root-partition. |
7 |
> > |
8 |
> > These days you have absolutely no guarantee that a partition is in the |
9 |
> > location on the disk where the cylinder numbers imply they should be. |
10 |
> > Disk manufacturers are free to put the bits of a disk that add up to this |
11 |
> > mythical thing called a "cylinder" any place they like, as long as the |
12 |
> > mapping between them is maintained. There is also no way I know of to ask |
13 |
> > a disk where a specific sector actually resides. |
14 |
> |
15 |
> No guarantee, but a pretty high chance: |
16 |
> dd if=/dev/sda2 of=/dev/null |
17 |
> ... |
18 |
> 957169664 bytes (957 MB) copied, 17.5531 s, 54.5 MB/s |
19 |
> |
20 |
> dd if=/dev/sda12 of=/dev/null |
21 |
> ... |
22 |
> 820854784 bytes (821 MB) copied, 21.4136 s, 38.3 MB/s |
23 |
> |
24 |
> I wouldn't care about this difference if I had a fast and big HDD or a |
25 |
> RAID but on a 5400rpm notebook HDD it really makes a difference, |
26 |
> especially when you are using tuxonice for suspend to disk. |
27 |
|
28 |
What do you conclude from this? |
29 |
|
30 |
|
31 |
-- |
32 |
alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com |