| 1 |
Alan McKinnon schrieb: |
| 2 |
> On Tuesday 02 September 2008 21:14:25 Florian Philipp wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
>> You should also consider putting them near the beginning of the disk. |
| 5 |
>> You can do this by booting a live-CD and use gparted to move your |
| 6 |
>> root-partition. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> These days you have absolutely no guarantee that a partition is in the |
| 9 |
> location on the disk where the cylinder numbers imply they should be. Disk |
| 10 |
> manufacturers are free to put the bits of a disk that add up to this mythical |
| 11 |
> thing called a "cylinder" any place they like, as long as the mapping between |
| 12 |
> them is maintained. There is also no way I know of to ask a disk where a |
| 13 |
> specific sector actually resides. |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
No guarantee, but a pretty high chance: |
| 17 |
dd if=/dev/sda2 of=/dev/null |
| 18 |
... |
| 19 |
957169664 bytes (957 MB) copied, 17.5531 s, 54.5 MB/s |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
dd if=/dev/sda12 of=/dev/null |
| 22 |
... |
| 23 |
820854784 bytes (821 MB) copied, 21.4136 s, 38.3 MB/s |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
I wouldn't care about this difference if I had a fast and big HDD or a |
| 26 |
RAID but on a 5400rpm notebook HDD it really makes a difference, |
| 27 |
especially when you are using tuxonice for suspend to disk. |
Archives