| 1 |
On Tuesday 08 May 2007 17.06.51 David Harel wrote: |
| 2 |
> Naga Toro wrote: |
| 3 |
> > Second, as stated just above that passage, it is not nessecary but |
| 4 |
> > recommended. |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> Here is a quotation from the doc: |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> To be completely safe that your system is in a sane state, you must |
| 9 |
> rebuild the toolchain and then world to make use of the new compiler. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> (Now how do I make the word MUST above underlined and bold?) ;-) |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
_underline_ *bold* usualy workes fine :) |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
But still atleast I interpret that as "should work without, but better safe |
| 16 |
then sorry". |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
But then later in the same doc it says: |
| 19 |
"If you upgrade from gcc 3.3 to 4.1, do not use the method based on |
| 20 |
revdep-rebuild, but do a complete system rebuild." |
| 21 |
so the answer to your question would be either stay with 3.3.6 and rebuild |
| 22 |
those packages that you emerged with 4.1.1 or upgrade to 4.1.1 and rebuild |
| 23 |
system + world (ccache is highly recomended). |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
-- |
| 26 |
Naga |
| 27 |
-- |
| 28 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
Archives