| 1 |
On Monday 11 July 2011 23:43:06 Peter Humphrey wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Monday 11 July 2011 17:26:36 Sebastian Beßler wrote: |
| 3 |
> > Am Mo 11 Jul 2011 17:18:16 CEST, Peter Humphrey schrieb: |
| 4 |
> > > I doubt I shall ever accept 'reoccur', any more than I accept |
| 5 |
> > > 'transportation'. |
| 6 |
> > |
| 7 |
> > It's way OT but what is wrong with 'transportation'. |
| 8 |
> > If it is wrong, how would it be right? |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> It isn't wrong, it's just silly. Americans love to add '-ation' to |
| 11 |
> everything. Just consider 'motivation', for example. It nearly always means |
| 12 |
> 'motive'. Ditto 'medication', which is nearly always 'medicine'. I could go |
| 13 |
> on all night, but this is much too far off topic already. (I didn't mean to |
| 14 |
> launch a troll - I just get wound up about poor language - sorry. And while |
| 15 |
> I'm at it, an adverb should not precede the verb of the sentence. This is |
| 16 |
> not German. And in English we do not put a comma between the verb and the |
| 17 |
> predicate. Anyone who wants to discuss things like this seriously is welcome |
| 18 |
> to contact me off-list.) |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> > I'm not a native speaker so I might be blind to see the error. |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> I can see that, but i'm impressed by your grasp of your second language, |
| 23 |
> which is incomparably superior to my grasp of your first. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
well, your language is broken beyond help anyway (as everybody who was forced |
| 27 |
to learn this clusterfuck* realized in the second or third week) so why get |
| 28 |
your panties in a knot? It can hardly get worse. Maybe better. |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
*) most accurate description of the english language I ever read: |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
http://www.schlockmercenary.com/2001-07-22 |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
-- |
| 35 |
#163933 |
Archives