1 |
On 2012-02-15 5:16 PM, walt <w41ter@×××××.com> wrote: |
2 |
> On 02/15/2012 10:12 AM, Tanstaafl wrote: |
3 |
>> We use Thunderbird+Lightning+Provider for Google Calendar+Google |
4 |
>> Calendar here in our office, and the calendaring really is becoming |
5 |
>> more and more problematic for us, mostly with respect to interacting |
6 |
>> with Meeting Invites from external users of Outlook/Exchange. |
7 |
|
8 |
> I can't answer your question, so I'll ask one instead :) Do you have |
9 |
> any idea where the problem is occurring, i.e. on the client side or on |
10 |
> the Google server side? |
11 |
|
12 |
In Thunderbird, in order to be able to interact with meeting invites |
13 |
(ie, be able to pointy-clicky the Accept/Update/Decline buttons), you |
14 |
have to enable sending emails - but there is a problem with Google |
15 |
Calendars where when you accept an update, it spams every participant |
16 |
WITH A NEW INVITE, instead of just notifying them of your acceptance... |
17 |
this causes great confusion and consternation for the other participants |
18 |
(why am I getting an invite from you for a meeting that someone else |
19 |
organized??)... |
20 |
|
21 |
Yes, I use the Provider extension to, and its author claims that this is |
22 |
a limitation in the google API. |
23 |
|
24 |
>> I'm curious if anyone has any suggestions for a hosted calendaring |
25 |
>> solution that works well with Thunderbird+Lightning *and* deals |
26 |
>> properly with meeting invites from outlook/Exchange users? |
27 |
|
28 |
> Once again, just out of curiosity, have you tried Evolution on the client |
29 |
> side to see if it has the same problems that thunderbird/lightening has? |
30 |
|
31 |
Sadly, we are a Windows shop, and although it has admittedly been a |
32 |
while, I have seen nothing to indicate that Evolution is any better on |
33 |
Windows than it ever has been. When I played with it (last time was |
34 |
maybe a year or more ago), it was totally unusable/buggy/crashing all |
35 |
the time. Has the windows port improved to a point that I may want to |
36 |
give it another try? |