1 |
On 07/21/2011 04:57 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote: |
2 |
> On Wed, 20 Jul 2011 18:34:03 -0400, Michael Orlitzky wrote: |
3 |
> |
4 |
>>>> I've always wondered why, if portage knows that has to be done, can't |
5 |
>>>> portage just go ahead and do it? |
6 |
>>> |
7 |
>>> Now that we have a set to do this, I see no reason why this could not |
8 |
>>> be an option, enabled by a USE flag. |
9 |
>>> |
10 |
>>> |
11 |
>> |
12 |
>> The last time I complained about this, someone sent me here: |
13 |
>> |
14 |
>> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=192319 |
15 |
> |
16 |
> That seems to be discussing ABI changes. The X drivers situation is |
17 |
> different. Also, that issue has largely been resolved, in as much as ABI |
18 |
> changes don't break things like they used to, with @preserved-rebuild. |
19 |
> |
20 |
> |
21 |
|
22 |
Huh? If implemented, that would allow |
23 |
FORCEREBUILD=x11-drivers/xf86-input* on major Xorg upgrades. |