| 1 |
On Wed, 20 Jul 2011 18:34:03 -0400, Michael Orlitzky wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> >> I've always wondered why, if portage knows that has to be done, can't |
| 4 |
> >> portage just go ahead and do it? |
| 5 |
> > |
| 6 |
> > Now that we have a set to do this, I see no reason why this could not |
| 7 |
> > be an option, enabled by a USE flag. |
| 8 |
> > |
| 9 |
> > |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> The last time I complained about this, someone sent me here: |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=192319 |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
That seems to be discussing ABI changes. The X drivers situation is |
| 16 |
different. Also, that issue has largely been resolved, in as much as ABI |
| 17 |
changes don't break things like they used to, with @preserved-rebuild. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
-- |
| 21 |
Neil Bothwick |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
Programming Language: (n.) a shorthand way of describing a series of bugs |
| 24 |
to a computer or a programmer. |
Archives