Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Cc: Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] no ebuilds to satisfy ">=dev-libs/grantlee-0.1"
Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2011 09:16:16
Message-Id: 201104241114.07713.alan.mckinnon@gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] no ebuilds to satisfy ">=dev-libs/grantlee-0.1" by Dale
1 Apparently, though unproven, at 09:30 on Sunday 24 April 2011, Dale did opine
2 thusly:
3
4 > Alan McKinnon wrote:
5 > > Apparently, though unproven, at 06:32 on Sunday 24 April 2011, Dale did
6 > > opine
7 > >
8 > > thusly:
9 > >> Well, I synced and got this interesting message:
10 > >>
11 > >> root@fireball / # emerge -uvDNp world
12 > >>
13 > >> These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
14 > >>
15 > >> Calculating dependencies... done!
16 > >>
17 > >> emerge: there are no ebuilds to satisfy ">=dev-libs/grantlee-0.1".
18 > >> (dependency required by "kde-base/kjots-4.5.95" [ebuild])
19 > >> (dependency required by "kde-base/kdepim-meta-4.5.95" [ebuild])
20 > >> (dependency required by "kde-base/kde-meta-4.6.2[semantic-desktop]"
21 > >> [installed])
22 > >> (dependency required by "@selected" [set])
23 > >> (dependency required by "@world" [argument])
24 > >> root@fireball / #
25 > >>
26 > >> So, it is not masked or keyworded, it just plain ain't there. Since
27 > >> this is unstable, should I report it as a bug or wait on the Raid to
28 > >> show up on it's own?
29 > >
30 > > so is it kjots from the kde overlays that's doing it?
31 >
32 > I don't have any overlays on here that I know of, unless portage did
33 > something fancy that I'm not aware of. It appears that something got
34 > moved into the tree but maybe one ebuild got missed. That's the reason
35 > for my post and the question. Am I correct or is there something fishy
36 > on my system? I did wait a few hours and sync again, just in case I got
37 > it in the middle of the change or something. This is the correct
38 > command for listing local overlays correct?
39
40 I just synced myself, and it's not an overlay issue.
41
42 kdepim-4.5.95 just got moved into the tree (masked) and you likely have one or
43 more of those package unmasked. Or a mask is missing in the tree.
44
45 Either way, find the list in $PORTDIR/profiles/package.mask and comparing with
46 what update world wants to do, you will see what needs to be done next.
47
48 kdepim-4.5.95 is not the version you want, latest useable is 4.4.11 (it's out
49 of step with version numbers of everything else in kde)
50
51
52
53 --
54 alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com