Re: [gentoo-user] no ebuilds to satisfy ">=dev-libs/grantlee-0.1"

[Dale]

Alan McKinnon wrote:
> Apparently, though unproven, at 06:32 on Sunday 24 April 2011, Dale did opine
> thusly:
>
>
>> Well, I synced and got this interesting message:
>>
>> root@fireball / # emerge -uvDNp world
>>
>> These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
>>
>> Calculating dependencies... done!
>>
>> emerge: there are no ebuilds to satisfy ">=dev-libs/grantlee-0.1".
>> (dependency required by "kde-base/kjots-4.5.95" [ebuild])
>> (dependency required by "kde-base/kdepim-meta-4.5.95" [ebuild])
>> (dependency required by "kde-base/kde-meta-4.6.2[semantic-desktop]"
>> [installed])
>> (dependency required by "@selected" [set])
>> (dependency required by "@world" [argument])
>> root@fireball / #
>>
>> So, it is not masked or keyworded, it just plain ain't there.  Since
>> this is unstable, should I report it as a bug or wait on the Raid to
>> show up on it's own?
>>
> so is it kjots from the kde overlays that's doing it?
>
>

I don't have any overlays on here that I know of, unless portage did 
something fancy that I'm not aware of.  It appears that something got 
moved into the tree but maybe one ebuild got missed.  That's the reason 
for my post and the question.  Am I correct or is there something fishy 
on my system?  I did wait a few hours and sync again, just in case I got 
it in the middle of the change or something.  This is the correct 
command for listing local overlays correct?

root@fireball / # layman -l
root@fireball / #

If that is correct, I shouldn't have any overlays.  I don't want to file 
a bug and it be me. < red face >  If the tree has a boo boo, I'd like to 
report it so it can get fixed otherwise someone else will run into this 
little error.

Dale

:-)  :-)