| 1 |
On 09/17/2014 10:40 PM, Mark David Dumlao wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> Fact is if it's _you_ that seems to give a tweet about systemd speed, |
| 4 |
> so it's on _you_ to measure it, I don't really care what you think. The |
| 5 |
> fact that you think pid1's speed or resource usage might be a big deal |
| 6 |
> is very indicative on how badly informed you are in the first place. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
I don't care about systemd speed. I really am completely ambivalent |
| 9 |
about PID1; I've run Upstart, I've run systemd, I've run OpenRC, and |
| 10 |
they all work fine. All I'm saying is that a common point in the systemd |
| 11 |
community seems to be its awesome performance (unless I'm reading the |
| 12 |
wrong documentation and conversations), and burden of proof is on the |
| 13 |
party making the claim. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
But also, caring about speed and resource usage are important. If one of |
| 16 |
the three PID1s I've mentioned took 30 seconds to boot my system, I |
| 17 |
would not use it. If it took 10% of my RAM, I would not use it. Lucky |
| 18 |
for us, all three are fast enough and have a small enough footprint that |
| 19 |
it doesn't matter which is used. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Alec |
Archives