1 |
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 19:26, Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com> wrote: |
2 |
> On Wed, 21 Sep 2011 12:15:02 +0700 |
3 |
> Pandu Poluan <pandu@××××××.info> wrote: |
4 |
> |
5 |
>> Hmm, just ran eix-sync followed by emerge -pvuD @world... |
6 |
>> |
7 |
>> And I was unpleasantly surprised when I see |
8 |
>> sys-kernel/hardened-sources going back from the currently installed |
9 |
>> (and booting) 2.6.39-r13 to -r8 |
10 |
>> |
11 |
>> Changelog does not described why -r13 is pulled. |
12 |
> |
13 |
> Actually it does :-) |
14 |
> |
15 |
> 13 Sep 2011; Anthony G. Basile <blueness@g.o> |
16 |
> -hardened-sources-2.6.32-r64.ebuild, |
17 |
> -hardened-sources-2.6.39-r12.ebuild, |
18 |
> -hardened-sources-2.6.39-r13.ebuild, -hardened-sources-3.0.3.ebuild: |
19 |
> Removed deprecated versions |
20 |
> |
21 |
> |
22 |
|
23 |
Yeah, it's "deprecated", but what does that mean, exactly? |
24 |
|
25 |
> Maybe -r13 just never made it to stable at all? |
26 |
> |
27 |
|
28 |
It's never stable, yes. But somehow I'm more comfortable with -r13 |
29 |
than -r8 (5 revisions). |
30 |
|
31 |
> If it's working fine for you and you are happy with -r13, then leave it |
32 |
> alone. It will continue to boot until you decide to upgrade to |
33 |
> something else. Maybe you should list that version explicitly in world |
34 |
> just in case it accidentally goes away with a hasty --depclean |
35 |
> |
36 |
|
37 |
I see. I'll just keep the -r13 sources then. |
38 |
|
39 |
Thanks! |
40 |
|
41 |
Rgds, |
42 |
-- |
43 |
FdS Pandu E Poluan |
44 |
~ IT Optimizer ~ |
45 |
|
46 |
• LOPSA Member #15248 |
47 |
• Blog : http://pepoluan.tumblr.com |
48 |
• Linked-In : http://id.linkedin.com/in/pepoluan |