| 1 |
On Wed, 21 Sep 2011 12:15:02 +0700 |
| 2 |
Pandu Poluan <pandu@××××××.info> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> Hmm, just ran eix-sync followed by emerge -pvuD @world... |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> And I was unpleasantly surprised when I see |
| 7 |
> sys-kernel/hardened-sources going back from the currently installed |
| 8 |
> (and booting) 2.6.39-r13 to -r8 |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> Changelog does not described why -r13 is pulled. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
Actually it does :-) |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
13 Sep 2011; Anthony G. Basile <blueness@g.o> |
| 15 |
-hardened-sources-2.6.32-r64.ebuild, |
| 16 |
-hardened-sources-2.6.39-r12.ebuild, |
| 17 |
-hardened-sources-2.6.39-r13.ebuild, -hardened-sources-3.0.3.ebuild: |
| 18 |
Removed deprecated versions |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Maybe -r13 just never made it to stable at all? |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
If it's working fine for you and you are happy with -r13, then leave it |
| 24 |
alone. It will continue to boot until you decide to upgrade to |
| 25 |
something else. Maybe you should list that version explicitly in world |
| 26 |
just in case it accidentally goes away with a hasty --depclean |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
> So, what should I do now? Should I recompile the kernel to 2.6.39-r8? |
| 30 |
> Or just use existing kernel? Or just forget 2.6.x completely and go |
| 31 |
> straight to 3.0.4-r2 ? |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
-- |
| 36 |
Alan McKinnnon |
| 37 |
alan.mckinnon@×××××.com |
Archives